🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a leading peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the state government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to mimic this path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, additional nations are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies adopt a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this international debate unfolds, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that states around the world are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.